Aedi., Eric Gurita (2021) Peranan Identitas Domisili dalam Menentukan Kompetensi Relatif Pengadilan (Studi Putusan Nomor 9/Pdt.G/2020/ PN Bbs). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Pancasakti Tegal.
![[img]](https://repository.upstegal.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
2. Eric Gurita Aedi Skripsi.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (880kB) |
Abstract
ABSTRAK Eric Gurita Aedi. Peranan Identitas Domisili dalam Menentukan Kompetensi Relatif Pengadilan (Studi Putusan Nomor 9/Pdt.G/2020/ PN Bbs). Skripsi. Tegal: Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pancasakti Tegal. 2020. Lingkungan Peradilan umum (yang dilaksanakan oleh Pengadilan Negeri dan Pengadilan Tinggi), memiliki kompetensi atau kewenangan untuk memeriksa dan mengadili perkara-perkara pidana dan perdata umum. Timbulnya suatu sengketa jika dihubungkan dengan keberadaan peradilan perdata maka dapat menimbulkan permasalahan kompetensi mengadili, yang biasa disebut dengan yurisdiksi (jurisdiction) atau kompetensi maupun kewenangan mengadili. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kedudukan hukum identitas domisili tergugat dan peranan identitas domisili tergugat dalam menentukan kompetesi relatif pada Putusan Nomor 9/Pdt.G/2020/PN Bbs. Penelitian merupakan penelitian kepustakaan (library research) dengan pendekatan hukum normatif. Sumber data dalam penelitian ini adalah data sekunder dengan metode pengumpulan data studi kepustakaan dan dokumen. Metode analisis data dilakukan secara deduktif dianalisa dengan metode normatif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini disimpulkan bahwa 1) Kedudukan hukum tergugat terkait identitas domisili pada Putusan Nomor 9/Pdt.G/2020/PN Bbs berdasarkan Pasal 118 ayat (1) HIR, antara lain: a) bertindak sebagai diri sendiri atas nama Risky Kheng yang beralamat di Jalan Indraloka II Blok H-V/1927/RT 009, RW 006, Kelurahan Wijaya Kusuma Kecamatan Grogol Petamburan, DKI Jakarta, dan b) bertindak dalam jabatannya sebagai General Manager PT. Santa Great Industry, berkantor di jalan Dokter Makaliwe Raya Nomor 26 Grogol Petamburan Jakarta Barat. 2) Peranan identitas domisili tergugat dalam menentukan kompetesi relatif pada Putusan Nomor 9/Pdt.G/2020/PN Bbs menunjukkan bahwa pengadilan negeri di tempat tergugat tinggal mempunyai alamat dan berdomisili yang berwenang memeriksa gugatan dan tuntutan hak. Prinsip kompetensi relatif berkaitan dengan wilayah hukum pengadilan yang berkompentensi mengadili berdasarkan tempat tinggal tergugat sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 118 ayat (1) HIR lebih unggul tanpa mengurangi kebolehan mengajukan gugatan pada PN menurut pasal-pasal tersebut, atas pilihan penggugat. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini diharapkan akan menjadi bahan informasi dan masukan bagi mahasiswa, akademisi, praktisi, dan semua pihak yang membutuhkan di lingkungan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pancasakti Tegal. Kata Kunci: Peran, Identitas Domisili, dan Kompetensi Relatif. =============================================================================================== ABSTRACT Eric Gurita Aedi. The Role of Domicile Identity in Determining the Relative Competence of the Court (Decision Study Number 9/Pdt.G/2020/PN Bbs). Skripsi. Tegal: Law Faculty Faculty of Law Study Program, Tegal Pancasakti University. 2020. The general court environment (which is implemented by the District Courts and High Courts), has the competence or authority to examine and adjudicate general criminal and civil cases. The emergence of a dispute if it is connected to the existence of a civil court, it can cause problems of competence to judge, which is commonly referred to as jurisdiction or competence or authority to judge. This study aims to determine the legal position of the defendant's domicile identity and the role of the defendant's domicile identity in determining the relative competency in Decision Number 9/Pdt.G/2020/PN Bbs. This research is a library research with a normative legal approach. The data source in this research is secondary data with the method of collecting data from literature and document studies. The data analysis method was done deductively and analyzed by qualitative normative method. The results of this study concluded that 1) The legal position of the defendant regarding domicile identity in Decision Number 9/Pdt.G/2020/PN Bbs based on Article 118 paragraph (1) of the HIR, among others: a) acted as oneself on behalf of Risky Kheng, whose address was on Jalan Indraloka II Blok HV/ 1927/RT 009, RW 006, Kelurahan Wijaya Kusuma, Grogol Petamburan District, DKI Jakarta, and b) acting in his position as General Manager of PT. Santa Great Industry, having its office at Jalan Dokter Makaliwe Raya Number 26 Grogol Petamburan, West Jakarta. 2) The role of the defendant's domicile identity in determining relative competence in Decision Number 9/Pdt.G/2020/PN Bbs shows that the district court where the defendant lives has an address and is domiciled which has the authority to examine claims and claims for rights. The principle of relative competence relates to the jurisdiction of the court which is competent to judge based on the residence of the defendant as stipulated in Article 118 paragraph (1) HIR is superior without reducing the ability to file a lawsuit at the District Court according to these articles, at the choice of the plaintiff. Based on the results of this study, it is hoped that it will become material for information and input for students, academics, practitioners, and all those in need in the Faculty of Law, Pancasakti University of Tegal. Keywords: Role, Domicile Identity, and Relative Competence.
| Item Type: | Karya Ilmiah (Skripsi) |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum |
| Depositing User: | Perpustakaan Pusat |
| Date Deposited: | 25 Feb 2021 05:33 |
| Last Modified: | 09 Jan 2023 03:24 |
| URI: | http://repository.upstegal.ac.id/id/eprint/3347 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |